Indiana Supreme Court hears late warrant arguments in child porn case

Lawyers for a man convicted of child exploitation argued the evidence — obtained via an untimely executed warrant — shouldn't have been considered, while the state maintained courts should decide on a case-by-case basis.

By: Leslie Bonilla Muñiz

Outlets: Indiana Capital Chronicle

Published: May 29, 2026

Words: 843

Last Updated: 1 month, 1 week ago

Body Text Preview

Lawyers for a man convicted of child exploitation told the Indiana Supreme Court on Thursday that the evidence was obtained through an unlawfully late warrant — and shouldn’t have been considered by lower courts.

“We need police officers to comply with the law,” said Brandon Murphy, an attorney defending Connor Bosworth.

“We have a very simple directive, a fundamental one, to law enforcement officers on how they are to execute warrants,” Murphy continued. “It’s a …

Create a free account to access this story and more

Join Plucky Wire to access full stories, collaborate with newsrooms, and discover content from networks around the world.

About

FAQ

Email Us