What happens when corporate obligations conflict with Alaska Native values?

By: Gloria Simeon, Ashlynn Simeon

Outlets: Alaska Beacon

Published: May 22, 2026

Words: 602

Last Updated: 2 months ago


Body Text Preview

Supporters of the Donlin Gold project often frame it as a matter of Alaska Native self-determination and fiduciary responsibility because the Alaska Native regional corporation Calista owns the mineral rights. However as Calista shareholders, we believe the deeper question is: What happens when corporate obligations directly conflict with Alaska Native values?

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act created Native corporations to use a Western corporate model focused on growth, investment and fiduciary return. Our peoples’ …

Create a free account to access this story and more

Join Plucky Wire to access full stories, collaborate with newsrooms, and discover content from networks around the world.

Register for Free Log in